Deutsch |
|
|
How we can survive, stop or avoid wars! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up
till today strategies were confined to damage the enemy at a maximum
possible. Not only to defend ourselves but also to terrorize the enemy with
bombs too! Repay bomb with bomb and develop always newer weapons and finally
the A-bomb! But world domination still wasn't reached. The more an enemy is
terrorized the stronger his resistance will become. Even big Russia is not in
position to dominate the small countries of
Afghanistan or Tschetschenia! In the western hemisphere there are also
examples how our strategie has failed pitifully and how it has brought even
mores divison into small groups! Big states like the Soviet Union
disintegrate and we are confronted with a lot of little Russian states. Many
of them are in possession of atomic weapons. And the risk of a atomic war
increases steadily. |
|
|
|
But
makes is sense to shoot back in case that Russia ot China has attacked us
with atomic missiles? Would this help us to survive? No, but the enemy
wouldn't survive either. |
|
|
|
But
is a dead enemy usefull for us if we're already dead? |
|
|
|
The
evolution must begin at the rat again. Neither we have won nothing at all nor
nature has. |
|
|
|
|
|
And
if we wouldn't shoot back? Well at least the enemy an his governement would
survive! But this one will not survive eternally either! See Gorbatschow and
his Perestroika! |
|
|
|
Wouldn't
it be better to shoot down the attacking atomic missiles instead of striking
back? I pay particullar attention to Reagens SDI,which is utopian, but in my
opinion the only strategy which could be helpfull in case of an amtomic
conflict. So wouldn't it be much better to search such solutions instead of producing always more powerfull and
dangerous retaliatory weapons? |
|
|
|
What
is retaliation? Is it usefull? If the enemy drops boms, so I'll throw some
bombs back! Of course the enemy wouldn't stop and we wouldn't stop neither. |
|
A
vicious circle!!! |
|
|
|
But
if we confine us to selfdefense only, the chance that the enemy will stop his
attacks will increase. And why shall we not, instead of fighting the enemy
with bombs, go to the hinterland (e.g. with paratroopers) and fight against
the enemy's inflammatory campaign! Helping the people of the enemy to
survive, to live, to train it, to inform it and to do resistance if they
want. Wouldn't this be a better solution? |
|
|
|
I
think this way could nearly all wars be stopped! Finally mankind could be
united and perhaps our threatened world can be saved at least. |
|
|
|
Because
one thing is clear - |
|
|
|
the
world can be saved together only! |
|
|
|
|
