Homepage: www.Rezamusic.com |
Band: www.Rezangela.com |
Journal: www.Rezajournal.com |
Videos: www.RezaTV.com |
Music Downloads: iTunes, etc. |
TO: SEC
Division of Enforcement, SEC Commissioners
Report to the
Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) to investigate trading and short-selling of Avanir
(AVNR).
AVANIR, A SMALL COMPANY AMONG NASDAQ’S TOP SHORT INTEREST
POSITION
CONSEQUENCE OF SEC’S HANDS-OFF APPROACH TOWARDS
SHORT-SELLERS ON THE ECONOMY
THOMAS WEI - JEFFERIES & COMPANY
I am a proponent of Freedom of Speech. However, no form of freedom is absolute, and may not be abused. In the classic “short and distort” setting which the SEC is well aware of (reference: 5 May 2009 “Roundtable to Examine Short Sale Price Test and Circuit Breaker Restrictions” in which, I believe, it was Commissioner Walter who referred to the concept), this freedom is abused. The short who distorts often abuses freedom of speech. In certain cases companies who are victimized take action against such abuse, but in most cases, they don’t bother.
The purpose
of this letter is to bring your attention to at least one such recent case, and
also to bring to light other actions, which I believe, might be abusive.
As in the
case of the gun-shop owner in
This
complaint alleges that Avanir Pharmaceuticals may have been a victim of
unethical and abusive short selling. Avanir (Nasdaq: AVNR) is a biopharmaceutical
company focused on acquiring, developing, and commercializing novel therapeutic
products for the treatment of central nervous system disorders. Within the past
year it received approval for the first and only FDA-approved treatment for PBA,
a debilitating condition which may occur in patients with ALS, MS, Parkinson's,
Stroke, TBI, and other neurologic conditions.
As of
The short
thesis has been that PBA is not a real disease, and Avanir is going after a
fictitious market. Science says otherwise. Credible surveys show there are
hundreds of thousands of PBA patients in the
The SEC,
specially, its Republican Commissioners, in the roundtable stated above, have
demonstrated to be pro-short selling, supposedly as a tool to help liquidity,
but while Wall Street enjoys its freedom to abuse short selling, Main Street is
faced with the ugly, unethical, and almost criminal side of this practice on a
day to day basis – something which our policeman, the SEC, doesn’t seem to care
a bit about.
I believe you
will go on for years seeking public comment and holding round tables but never acting,
never mandating that large short sellers publicly report their position in a
timely manner. The “frontrunner” excuse is just an excuse not to act. It just lets
abusive short selling, together with its abuse of freedom of speech, to rape
investors and small companies. This includes using journalists, and trolls who
disparage Avanir around the clock on public forums attempting to persuade
investors to sell their shares by causing fear uncertainty and doubt.
I also
believe you will never put a stop to this lack of pre-borrow requirement which
according to every criminal justice system, except the SEC’s, is just that:
criminal. It is very simple: if I sell your car without even asking you if I
could borrow it, it is criminal. This criminal abise happens in the
The
consequence of the SEC not caring about these unethical acts of “short and
distort” and “lack of timely disclosure of large short positions” and “lack of
pre-borrow requirement” is that innovation is killed, which in turn hurts the
US and the global economy.
In the case of Avanir, the company spent years and hundreds of millions of dollars in developing its medication to help hundreds of thousands of patients in the US and many more abroad, with a debilitating condition for which no other treatment had been approved. And a bunch of unethical cunning short sellers are doing everything they can to hurt the company. Avanir has enough cash to not depend on its stock in the short term but there are many other victims of short attacks which are destroyed because they can’t raise funds at attractive prices because short sellers have killed the stock.
In a recent
Tweet, Martin Shkreli (see below) wrote: “DNDN simply breathtaking-Some hedge
fund careers will end tomorrow -and I'm sure a few new superstars will be born.
so much 4 channel checks”. I assume what is meant by “channel checks” is
insider information. What else could it mean in this context? That if “channel
checks” were effective we would have known Dendreon had poor earnings. That
information is not public until it’s made public. Is it that in the world of
these hedge funds, receiving public information before it’s public is not
unusual? Isn’t that criminal?
In 9
trading days the price of Avanir soared from $3.25 to $4.80. This translates to
about $50,000,000 of losses for the short interest. Reaching $5 would have
meant new funds would be eligible to buy, potentially sending the losses for
short sellers into hundreds of millions of dollars as a whopping 31.6% of the
float is short.
On May 23,
Senator Herb Kohl, Congressman Henry Waxman, Congressman Frank Pallone, Congresswoman
Diana DeGette wrote the following letter to Avanir: http://aging.senate.gov/hearing_detail.cfm?id=332993&
There are
so many pharmas and so many have drugs which are much more expensive than
Avanir’s. Avanir is just a new kid of the block and is just learning how to
kick the ball, and just as its stock is about to reflect the true prospects for
the company these congress people decide to pick on Avanir to investigate the
pricing. We do not know the facts, but a lot of people, including respectable
industry analysts were appalled not just by this investigation, but by its
timing or considered it a non event. Influenced by shorts or not, it did set
off a momentum to push the stock down.
Recently,
the Senate Commission on Aging came to the conclusion that Avanir is off the
hook (http://aging.senate.gov/events/hr236rpt.pdf),
citing Avanir had spent $239 Million in developing the drug, etc., and outcome
everybody could predict, nevertheless, the company wasted precious resources
and tax payers wasted precious resources. Was this inquiry influenced by short
sellers? Many believe it did. I do not know. But I collected some of the
comments which can be found here: http://home.datacomm.ch/rezamusic/avanir_congress.html
Martin
“Marty” Shkreli of MSMB Capital Management (
Some info
about his background can be found on https://sites.google.com/site/vatsire/Searching-for-Martin-Shkreli
Noteable in
his background:
- Four
years at Jim Cramer’s company, “Cramer Berkowitz”. I’d like to remind you of
Jim Cramer’s famous statement which perfectly portrays the corrupt values of
some powerful elements of Wall Street:
"But what’s important when
you’re in that hedge fund mode is to not do a thing remotely truthful, because
the truth is so against your view that it’s important to create a new truth to
develop a fiction."
- Mr.
Shkreli was sued by Lehman Brothers and a $2,300,600.00 judgment was levied
against Mr. Shkreli, et al. by the Supreme Court of the State of
On
The timing
of this article was also suspect. It was released a few days after the Congress
inquiry while the market was ignoring the congress inquiry as insignificant and
the stock was beginning to rally again. The day he released the letter the stock
was $4.74. Avanir was a victim of further short attacks again, the short
interest rose, and the price went as low as $3 in the following weeks.
Mr. Shkreli
continues to disparage Avanir in his Tweets and discourage investors from
buying Avanir stock.
Mr.
Feuerstein is a senior columnist for TheStreet.com, again, associated with Jim
Cramer, and reportedly in contact with Martin Shkreli (according to his
Tweets). He has touted and celebrated when Avanir showed a weak week sales data
in the earlier stages of the launch but remained awfully quiet on many weeks
when the sales data were very good. He just tweeted a statement which some
interpret as making fun of PBA: “For those who haven't laughed or cried
uncontrollably enough over the past 2 days, we have $AVNR earnings on Monday.”
Neither
Shkreli nor Feuerstein have any academic degrees we know about which qualifies
them to judge biotech companies. Here’s one website dedicated to exposing
Feuerstein: http://www.exposeadam.com.
“Adam Feuerstein wouldn’t know good science if it bit him in the ass" -
Dr. William A. Carter
Around
November 2010 Jefferies had a $10 and then $15 price target for Avanir. They
underwrote a public offering for the company at a price of around $4.40. Their
analyst Andrew Fein was very bullish about the stock: "To add icing to the
cake, there is no black box warning on Nuedexta's label, which gives Nuedexta
no restrictions in its target patient population".
Things have
only gotten better since then for Avanir. Weekly script numbers have been
rising. Yet short interest grew to over 33 Million shares. But Jefferies’ analyst
Thomas Wei “initiated” coverage of Avanir and gave it a price target to $3.50
despite citing a $4B market potential.
Three other
analysts who follow the stock all have much higher price targets (e.g. Wedbush:
$13, covered by the notable analyst with excellent credentials and track
record, Dr. Gregory Wade). Thomas Wei has consistently
done a hatchet job on Avanir including his latest so called report which we
have indication to believe it makes the short interest happy. I suspect Jefferies
might have clients who hold large short interests in Avanir.
In his
latest hatchet job, Thomas Wei took a stab at European estimates which he’s
entitled to, but whether they’re fair or accurate, and whether they’re a part
of a short-and-distort scheme or not is another question. It happened on the
day the company released a good news article about
I tried to
contact the firm, both Mr. Wei and their CEO, Mr. Handler, for comments but either
they were not reachable (Mr. Handler) or rude and refused to talk to me after
giving me the run around (Mr. Wei’s organization). Other analysts who stand
behind what they say are not afraid of talking with investors and journalists. Whose
side is Mr. Handler on? Truth, fairness, or short sellers?
Public
opinion about Jefferies’ hatchet jobs have not been kind. Jefferies has been
accused of “representing the interests of those who are short”, and of being a
"short propagandist”. I do not know if these charges are true or not but
am only including these as a citizen journalist.
If the SEC
has any interest in investigating the trades in Avanir, this tiny company’s
shares, which is among the top shorted stocks on Nasdaq, you may get surprised
at what you find.
The least
-
Enforcement
of rules that require fair analyst reports which includes disclosure of number
of clients who have a large short position
-
Timely
public disclosure of short interest by large short sellers
-
A
pre-borrow requirement
-
Criminal
prosecution of “short-and-distort” incidents and not leaving it up to victimized
companies to litigate civil cases against cash rich hedge fund perpetrators
I hope I
have provided some tips and hints in this letter. Please investigate the
trading in Avanir (AVNR) shares.
Thanks
& Regards
R. Ganjavi
<contact info>
http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/03/markets/jefferies_hedgefunds/index.htm
"Dozens of Jefferies (JEF) hedge fund clients are scrambling to find another investment bank where they can warehouse client's money and execute trades, according to sources in the prime brokerage divisions at three competing banks. These sources said they spent all day Thursday fielding calls from hedge funds who could be potential clients....Jefferies has roughly 400 hedge fund clients that use its prime brokerage services to execute trades. It typically takes months, if not years, to win new hedge fund clients.... two sources said they inked deals with several Jefferies customers Thursday and were in constant conversations all day about signing on other clients. Lehman's demise killed several hedge funds and made operations difficult for others. "
400 Hedge Fund clients !!
Homepage: www.Rezamusic.com |
Journal: www.Rezajournal.com |
Band: www.Rezangela.com |
Videos: www.RezaTV.com |
Music Downloads: iTunes, etc. |